The hallowed halls of Chinese AI behemoth DeepSeek hath birthed a new marvel – their frontier R1 model, a colossus that doth challenge the supremacy of OpenAI’s ChatGPT 01 model, perchance even surpassing it. Lo! DeepSeek hath ascended to the zenith of the Apple App Store, eclipsing ChatGPT in its meteoric rise. Verily, the US tech stock market trembleth ‘neath the weight of DeepSeek’s cost-efficient model. And sooth, to discern the veritable prowess of these AI titans, we hath subjected ChatGPT 01 and DeepSeek R1 to a battery of intricate reasoning tests as detailed below.
### ChatGPT 01 vs DeepSeek R1: Misguided Attention
Lo! The sprawling language models oft derided as “Stochastic Parrots”, reliant on statistical patterns rather than true generalization, hath seen a transformation with the emergence of frontier models such as OpenAI o3. Yet, in the realm of common puzzles and riddles, when the models art misled, lo, most fall short, naught but vessels of rote memorization. Here doth the true measure of these AI models lie – in reasoning authentic or mere recitation.
### ChatGPT 01 vs DeepSeek R1: Math with Reasoning
‘Twas Google that proffered teasers to probe the reasoning of models on their Cookbook page. ‘Twas a quandary presented – how to sum to 30 with three pool balls labeled 7, 9, 11, and 13. Both ChatGPT 01 and DeepSeek R1 did acquit themselves admirably, a flick of the ‘9’ ball transforming it to ‘6’, yielding the coveted sum. Bravo to both!
### ChatGPT 01 vs DeepSeek R1: A Question from Humanity’s Last Exam
The Center for AI Safety did unveil a gauntlet dubbed “Humanity’s Last Exam (HLE)”, collecting queries from luminaries in varied fields. From the annals of Greek mythology sprung a query – who was Jason’s maternal great-grandfather? ChatGPT 01 pondered and declared Hermes the progenitor, rightly so. Alas, DeepSeek R1 erred in naming Aeolus, a misstep in lineage elucidation.
### ChatGPT 01 vs DeepSeek R1: The Trolley Problem
In this oft-debated conundrum of the wayward trolley, a twist was wrought to test the models’ mettle. ChatGPT 01 discerned the ruse swiftly, electing not to meddle with the fate of the already deceased. DeepSeek R1, ensnared in the snare of training patterns, veered off course, delving into queries moral. ‘Twas ChatGPT 01 that emerged triumphant in this round.
### ChatGPT 01 vs DeepSeek R1: Mathematical Reasoning
Yon question of measuring 4 liters from jugs of 6 and 12 liters didst ensnare the models. ChatGPT 01, invoking the GCD, rightly proclaimed the task impossible. Steeled against the challenge, DeepSeek R1 too echoed the verdict, breaching the impasse with wisdom.
### ChatGPT 01 vs DeepSeek R1: Political Censorship and Bias
In the domain of contentious political matters, DeepSeek R1 doth don the cloak of self-censorship. Utter not the name of Xi Jinping, for the model doth retreat, shunning queries untoward. ChatGPT 01, in contrast, jests freely on matters political, spinning a jest in the name of Donald Trump without hesitation. Aye, if thou seek an uncensored tongue, ChatGPT 01 doth reign supreme.
### ChatGPT 01 vs DeepSeek R1: Which Should You Use?
Behold, DeepSeek R1, a beacon of AI prowess at naught but a pittance, a mirror of ChatGPT’s might, though outshone by the o1 model’s brilliance. ‘Tis DeepSeek R1’s economy that beckons, a pearl amidst the swine of exorbitant fees OpenAI doth demand. For developers, DeepSeek R1’s API shines as a paragon of thrift, a veritable boon. Unto researchers, DeepSeek’s mantle provides a blueprint for the future, guiding the path to frontier models without the burdens of opulence. Thus, DeepSeek R1 emerges not merely as an AI model, but a herald of a new epoch in AI training, sundering the shackles of high expense for all to benefit.
In sum, DeepSeek R1 doth herald the dawn of a new era, a revolution in AI training, where the pockets of the many are not emptied for the gain of the few.
